-->
Connect with us

Metro/Crimes

Court jails Enugu businessman over N5,695.000.00 fraud

Published

on

A Federal High Court sitting in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, presided over by Justice Akintayo Aluko has convicted the managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Jata Gas Limited, Jame Nwokpo for obtaining N5,695.000.00 by false pretence.

It also ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC) Enugu Zonal Office to re-arrest and produce him for sentencing.

DAILY POST gathered that Nwokpo was on Wednesday June, 17, 2020 convicted by the court.

EFCC said the offence was contrary to Section 1(1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and punishable under section 1(3) of the same Act.

The anti-graft spokesman, Dele Oyewale disclosed this in a statement to newsmen in Abuja.

He added, “The petitioner had alleged that sometime in 2014, one Francis Emeka introduced him to Nwokpo, who was the MD/CEO of Jata Gas Nigeria Limited for the purpose of supplying him Automated Gas Oil (AGO) and Petroleum Motor Spirit (PMS) and despite the payment of the said sum, the products were never supplied nor money returned to him.

“Investigation carried out by the Commission revealed that the complainant paid the total sum of N5.6million to the convict’s Diamond Bank account. It was further discovered that the convict’s claim of losing over N129 000, 000(One Hundred and Twenty Nine Million Naira only), which was his excuse for not supplying the products, was false.

“It was also discovered that neither Nwokpo nor his company, Jata Gas Nigeria Ltd was registered nor licensed by the Department for Petroleum Resources (DPR) to deal in petroleum products.

“In the course of trial, the convict jumped bail, prompting the prosecution team led by Mainforce Adaka Ekwu to apply for a bench warrant and trial of the convict which the court granted. Three witnesses were called by EFCC after which it closed its case while applying for sentencing of the convict.

“In his judgment, Justice Aluko held that the prosecution has proved its case and convicted the defendant in absentia, while ordering for his re-arrest”.

Trending