Connect with us


Court strikes out suit to sack Deputy Senate President,  Omo-Agege, slams plaintiff N12m fine



A Federal High Court in Abuja, Thursday dismissed a suit seeking to sack the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege over alleged perjury.

Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed in a judgment held the case instituted against Omo-Agege was a gross abuse of court process having been filed in several courts.

Justice Mohammed who held that the issue raised against Omo-Agege had already been laid to rest after Justice Othman Musa of the FCT High Court, delivered a judgment in the matter awarded a N300, 000 cost against the plaintiff which must be paid to each of the four respondents.

A civil group, Incorporated Trustees of Empowerment for Unemployed Youths Initiative had on May 19, approached the court, asking for an order for the withdrawal of the Certificate of Return issued to Omo-Agege.

Also joined as defendants in the suit are the Clerk of the National Assembly, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

In a suit number: FHC/ABJ/CS/510/2020 filed by its lawyer, Mr Edward Omaga, the group also prayed the court for an order of perpetual injunction restraining Omo-Agege from occupying the office of senator representing Delta Central Senatorial District and deputy senate president.

The group said its suit was based on the grounds that Omo-Agege was not a competent, fit and proper person to occupy such an office considering the conviction hanging over his neck.

The group predicated its suit on a judgment of the Department of the State Bar Court in Los Angeles, California, USA, delivered on Nov. 30, 1995, whereupon Omo-Agege was allegedly sentenced to jail and suspended from law practice for two years for felony involving moral turpitude, forgery of cheques amounting to $890 with which he intended to defraud the Bank of America, Ahined Mehone and Elpert Defrietas in violation of California penal code section 470.

The plaintiff prayed the court for interpretation of Section 68 of the 1999 Constitution; to determine whether by the combined interpretation of Section 68(1) (b) of the 1999 Constitution, the judgment of the Department of the State Bar Court sitting in Los Angeles, California, involving moral turpitude.

The plaintiff also prayed the court to award N500M damages against the clerk of the senate for accepting to declare Omo-Agege deputy senate president after his nomination and election on June 11, 2019.

At the hearing of the suit on June 16, the respondents’ lawyers, Dr Alex Izinyon, SAN, representing Omo-Agege, Chikosolu Ojukwu representing the Clerk of the Senate and the APC, as well as Taminu Inuwa, SAN for INEC, denied the alleged conviction and urged the court to dismiss the suit and award substantial cost against the plaintiff.

They all insisted that the appellate court in California in the US had cleared Omo-Agege of any wrongdoing in December 1996.

“Acquittal means legal certification that the accused is not guilty of the offence,” Izinyon had argued.

However, Justice Mohammed upheld the preliminary objection filed by the respondents.

He noted that the plaintiff ought to have immediately withdrawn the suit on realising that the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Abuja, a court with coordinate jurisdiction with the Federal High Court, had already decided the issue in the suit.

“It is manifestly clear from the judgment alluded to that, that there was no conviction as alleged,” he held.

The judge said that contrary to the contention of the plaintiff, it was bound by the FCT High Court judgment despite not being a party to suit in which the said judgment was delivered.

“In the light of the above, the plaintiff is bound by the judgment of my brother, Justice Othman Musa of the FCT High Court delivered on January 29 wherein it was declared that the defendant was not convicted.

He added that by refusing to take an immediate step of withdrawing the suit on being aware of the FCT High Court judgment, the plaintiff “lends crendence to the contention of the counsel for the first defendant that the suit was filed in obvious attempt to annoy and irritate the first defendant.”

The Judge dismissed the suit with a punitive cost of N1.2M awarded against the plaintiff and its lawyer, Mr Omaga.

Justice Mohammed specifically ordered that the plaintiff and its lawyer must pay the sum of N300,000 to each of the four respondents – Omo-Agege, the Clerk of the National Assembly, APC and INEC.